Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil's avatar

Professor Cochrane, have you ever discussed FTPL in the context of entitlement reform, specifically privatization of Social Security? I’m thinking of a reform under which the government issues debt and deposits the proceeds into personal accounts to fund future benefits. Future government surpluses would increase by the reduction in future SS benefit payments, which I think would be a highly credible.

This could be a voluntary program. For pre-retirees, ongoing FICA contributions (in whole or in part) would also be deposited into these accounts. Given that the balance remaining at death would be heritable, some individuals might be willing to accept an initial deposit less than the actuarial PV of their future SS benefits accumulated to-date (at some risk-adjusted discount rate). I also believe many individuals would willingly accept less in exchange for an account over which they have some control over investment direction. Such reductions in the initial deposits to personal accounts would mean that the issue of new debt would be smaller than the increase in future surpluses.

The choice of discounts applied to the PV of future benefits would be controversial, but different discounts could be tested to guage uptake. However, the issuance of debt would be gigantic, so some would undoubtedly fear an impossible strain on the credit market. Perhaps the transition could be staged over time to make it less “shocking”, but that would complicate matters.

I think something similar could be created for Medicare beneficiaries, who would have some proportion of their expected future benefits in a private account which they could use to pay for private or public coverage. Again, the increase in federal debt would be balanced against an increase in future surpluses.

I’d love to know whether there is a previous post or paper in which you addressed this topic, or any other FTPL treatment of SS privatization of which you’re aware.

Expand full comment
Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

Please spell out what each implies about central bank behavior. Like maybe (it's not my model, so you tell me), central bank inflation targeting generates interest rates that encourage the eventual surpluses. Also don't we need to know if deficits are financing consumption or investment?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts